This article was written when I was 17 years old, very young and too idealistic. You'll sense it from this article how naïve I was back then.
The article "Media Values and Society" written by Florangel Braid and Roberto Victoriano presents some reasons why and how media should be a tool in purveying Filipino values as a means to our national survival.
Media Values and Society
Certainly the media has the capacity to build consensus and respect for
nuances if it will only follow what is written in our constitution stating that
media should practice its rights for the common good, preservation of our
patrimony, rule of law, truth, justice, freedom, love, equality and peace;
including of course the educational goals- creative and critical thinking,
ethical and spiritual values, moral character, personal discipline, patriotism,
materialism, love of humanity, respect for human rights and duties of
citizenship, family solidarity.
With all these values the media is expected to purvey, how we do we
stray from the vision of a just and humane society? Does media really play its
part accordingly?
I dare say- I do not think so.
In fact I'd rather believe that the constitutional mandate is nothing
but an idealistic concept. How would you expect media to build consensus and
promote values when all it wants from the beginning is to procure income for
its investors. No one, not even the president can deny the fact that media instead
of uniting the Filipinos, has been a tool in creating a barrier between, for
instance the church and the government, nations against nations, military
versus the rebels, rich against poor.
With all the events that scarred our history, it's undeniably clear
that media has magnified a society full of prejudices and inequality towards
the innocent lives in all those caught in the crossfire.
When Money Talks
Did it ever make sense why media only listen to those who are wealthy
and are able to pay the right price? Why, because media is highly bias to the
powerful. Its one sidedness has made me believe that it can never unite what
has been divided for the last hundred years.
I want to stress that media with all its crowning glory is not evil per
se. Of course media above all else is operated by people and as we know, people
can be society's aggressor or defender. To be fair, media has played an
important role when it comes to political issues. Even the president use media
to inform the world of his achievements.
What I can't stand about media is that it tries to justify its
exploitation of our society. Of course not just the obscene materials that it
shows but also the current situation of the poor. Media as always, if not most
of the time, would show these unfortunate ones in filthy, impoverished and uneducated
images; instead of extending help, the affluent tend to look the other way.
Media and the Filipino Values
Media has been portrayed as a tool for the preservation of our values. The
use of media is always sought to elicit educational TV shows and investigative
reports. Nevertheless, if one was to measure the effectiveness of media whether
it really promotes values or not; the results would probably be that of an
unsustainable function.
I still dream of seeing the world where values such as frugality,
discipline and entrepreneurship would be prioritized by the media. However, entrepreneurship
(aka business) has taken over the list of values in the race for money and high
ratings. How media and values can co-exist is still a mystery (yes it's not
rocket science but tremendously challenging in this age). In the end, it is society which becomes the
prime victim.
Media and Society
To be fair, I would like to quote Rosario-Braid on how media can
promote a people-oriented agenda:
First, they can give a wider choice in ideas and information instead of
saying that "this is what the people want."
Second, media can offer alternative scenarios (that reinforces positive
change or motivation).
Third, media can enable all sectors of society to be heard. We are not
talking here of just one or two viewpoints but an orchestra of voices- women,
youth, the senior citizens, government employees, the handicapped, and the
other special interest groups - from which a true consensus can emerge.
Fourth, by enabling a wider sharing of information, media can promote
the sharing of power between the government and the governed.
Fifth, media can return to its place of origin and this is in the
community…. This participatory process enhances even more the process of
empowerment of the small, marginalized sectors of society.
Sixth, instead of formenting conflict and controversy, media should
help resolve conflicts, build consensus and promote non-violence as an
alternative.
This article was written back in July 2003 for my Communication Society class,
under Professor Arsenio
Media and Society authored by Florangel
Rosario-Braid was a paper presented at the Symposium, Media and Society
sponsored by the Asia Foundation Fellows, July 11, 1989.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We'd love to hear from you. Comment your reactions below.